This image has been resized. Click on the View larger version link in the sidebar for a high-quality version.
Hide this message.
Image samples have been disabled. If you find this to be too slow, you can turn samples back on in your profile settings.
Search
Tags
Statistics
- Id: 78668
- Posted: 1.3 years ago by potinya
- Size: 1406x2097
- Rating: Safe
- Score: 28 (vote up)
- Favorited by: Alioth, captainwoodroe, topcdmouse, ooboom, narutohinatausamakai, Rock, mirumu, Motsu, nega3, Ophelia, yurineko, agustin, dayoflayo, fil27, LordHaru, vita, TrumpGirl, reiserFS, Yincus, khleex, KamikazeKoga (15 more)
Options


Aurelia
Posted 1.3 years agoStop removing the overfiltered tag. This image IS indeed overfiltered. Can't you see how flat and blurry it looks?
petopeto
Posted 1.3 years agoThis is so blurry it's hard to look at even in the sample. I'm inclined to delete it...
syaoran-kun
Posted 1.3 years agoshame...the image is so cute :/
Radioactive
Posted 1.3 years agoWeren't there more overfiltered Tayutama scans? Maybe my imagination.
Xtea
Posted 1.3 years agopost #78525 is one of them
midzki
Posted 1.3 years ago600dpi telephone card (or same size card) scan always failed.
petopeto
Posted 1.3 years agoI've banned him for a few days.
This may not actually be overfiltered--if it's a telecard, this is typical--but repeatedly reverting the tag instead of explaining himself is obviously unacceptable behavior.
potinya2
Posted 1.3 years agoNew ID is used because it was blocked. overfiltered tag is Unpleasantness.As for the addition of tag, I want you to make it only to the feature of the picture.The comment on noticed seeing a little while ago at the following. I think that sentences are amusing because I use the translation site.
petopeto
Posted 1.3 years agoTry your language. Someone here may know it.
petopeto
Posted 1.3 years agoI unblocked him, and he went and deleted all of his posts. So, I'm permanently banning him, undeleting the posts, and I'll probably implement a deletion deadline so people can't do this. Guess it was inevitable that someone would be a dick enough to make it necessary, but it's a shame that people are so juvenile...
fireattack
Posted 1.3 years agoI think the quality is a little bad but the art is good enough for leaving them here since we don't have a substitute. Also post #78525.
petopeto
Posted 1.3 years agoRelative to the source, the quality is fine (http://page13.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/r55597634). It just needed to be tagged so we know what we're looking at.
midzki
Posted 1.3 years agohttp://moe.imouto.org/pool/show/220
there are worse >_>
petopeto
Posted 1.3 years agoThey're okay at normal resolution (zoom out). Zooming them to monitor size is just too much, and the print quality isn't great...
midzki
Posted 1.3 years agoI know the print quality of cards.
It makes me give up scanning.
post #61515 was the best I can, but I have a beef on the result.