Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you
want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just
verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose
a different name.
Enter the email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes.
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
Danbooru-based image board with a specialization in high-quality images.
Not only it's progressive, also it hasn't high-saturated color which jpeg can't handle good.
although jpeg artifacts are clearly visible on this image for me (but it's photo realistic, so not ugly) (ﾟ∀ﾟ)
Osikaa
Posted 3 months agoFirst post! Why flagged?? >A<
SciFi
Posted 3 months agoGood question.
There are posts tagged jpeg_artifacts that are far worse. You can barely see them on this one.
blooregardo
Posted 3 months agolooking closer there's barely no artifacts
Azarel
Posted 3 months agoI totally agree with the above posts, there is no good reason to delete this pic
Britannica
Posted 11 days agoWhy only 200Kb ...hiks...
midzki
Posted 10 days agoNot only it's progressive, also it hasn't high-saturated color which jpeg can't handle good.
although jpeg artifacts are clearly visible on this image for me (but it's photo realistic, so not ugly) (ﾟ∀ﾟ)
MDGeist
Posted 3 days agois there a hq version of this and post #78276 , too?